GMS Law | Norwich Solicitors

Asbestos Claims

Asbestos claims for mesothelioma, asbestosis, pleural thickening and lung cancer

Medical Negligence

Medical Negligence claims for GP, Hospital and Dental mistakes.

Personal Injury

Work Related Accident, been hurt whilst on holiday, road traffic accident or hurt from using a defective product or service.

Business Litigation

Breach of contract, unpaid debts, medication and employment law.


Damaged reputation in business or in personal life.

Professional Negligence

Mistakes made by Solicitors, Financial Advisors, Accountants, Surveyors and Banks.

Motoring Compensation

Car and bike accidents, passenger and pedestrian claims – more than 95% of our cases are successful.

Private Clients

Wills and Probate, Divorce and Family Law, Employment issues, Dispute and Court work.

We can help you! Call us now for free on 0800 046 3272

Latest blog posts


Undercover Surveillance on Clinical Negligence Claimants on the Rise

The use of private detectives to follow potential Claimants who sue the NHS for compensation is on the rise. A record of 55 surveillance operations were authorised in 2016 – 2017 up from 24 in 2013 -2014. The purpose of obtaining the covert surveillance evidence in Clinical Negligence Claims is to attempt to show that the Claimant’s injuries or on-going disabilities are less than what they are claiming, or that they are inconsistent with the Claimant’s evidence.  So obtaining surveillance evidence is an additional expense being incurred by the NHS (the Government) to try and avoid paying out on Claims even where they accept that the patient received negligence treatment. […]

Continue reading »


GMS Law Succeed where other Norwich Firm Failed

GMS Law Succeed where other Norwich Firm Failed Richard Clegg, Director and Head of the Commercial Litigation Department, has recently settled a Professional Negligence Claim for Stephen Leigh, local builder. Mr Leigh initially took forward his Claim through other Solicitors – who would not take the case forward on a No Win No Fee basis. Mr Leigh was therefore in a position whereby he had paid thousands of pounds to his Solicitor and also a thousand pounds to a Barrister, but despite the Solicitor and the Barrister thinking that Mr Leigh had a viable Claim, they would not take the case forward for him – leaving Mr Leigh out of […]

Continue reading »